Hubbs just came home with âBattleshipâ. Yeah, heâs always good at picking out a nice romantic move for me. Bring on the explosions! Oh Yeah!
Anyway⌠I did not have high hopes for this movie because it was not in the theaters long⌠so letâs dissect why.
This movie is about aliens coming down to Earth and trying to blow everything up. For that part ⌠well done. Excellent special effects and awesome aliens and ship designs.
But a story needs more than that, right? Characters and plot and people to root for.
Well, this movie had all that, so I was wondering half way through why I wasnât enjoying it. Then Hubbs said, âIâm not really worried about any of these characters. I just donât care.â
You know what? He was right.
However, at the end of the movie, a bunch of characters came in that were beautifully introduced at the very beginning of the movie, and all of the sudden you had someone to root for.
This is a horrible movie, with a great ending.
So whatâd they do wrong? Letâs discuss.
Main character: We didnât like him. Not in any shape or form. They tried to give him a ânice sideâ by having him break the law to get a girl a burrito so she will talk to him (donât ask) but it just didnât work.
The next problem is: right after this happens, the story swishes ahead years later, and he and that girl are going to get married. Huh? Howâd that happen? We missed out on all that part of the story, so we were never engaged in their relationship. We didnât feel any emotion or worry about either of them when they were in trouble because we never felt emotion between them. Make sense?
Next problem: I have no problem with a tramp troupe beautiful woman when it works. Transformers, for instance. (The first one⌠I try to forget the others were ever made) The troupe pretty girl worked there. In Battleship, they force-fed the beautiful girl in there that just didnât need to be there for the storyâŚand then they out of the blue made her a psychiatrist or something so she could be one of the secondary heroâs doctors to give her a place in the story, where the secondary hero could have done it himself. Sorry, didnât work for me.
Poor choice of main character.
You will understand this if youâve seen the end. The guys at the end would have been much better main characters. The end was awesome. What a testimony to retired armed forces, and good old fashioned building materials. Right?
We were on our feet, we were cheering. Oh wait, sit down, cutting back to the dumb bimbo again. Okay, back up on our feet! Weâre back with the other guys!
The people at the end, to me, were the heroes⌠Good old fashioned heroes. These were the guys I wanted to see.
Get rid of the troupe hunky main character â especially one as unlikable as him
Get rid of the senseless bimbo factor, unless she really has a role other than driving a car and running in a poorly fit bra.
Keep the secondary hero that has a REASON for having a bad attitude. Yeah, I like the soldier without any legs. I understood why he was a jerk in the beginning. I wanted him to win. I was rooting for him.
Keep the guys at the end. (I canât tell you who or it will be a spoiler)
Yeah, the movie would have been shorter if theyâd done this, but the first half before the aliens got there was boring and pointless anyway.
I want to see a movie with the unexpected heroes at the end. People up against incredible odds, that you really and truly WANT to root for. They totally rocked!
Would I recommend this movie? Yes, totally. Awesome action⌠but with the exception of the end (which was great)⌠look at it as a learning experience about how to NOT write a story.
And yes⌠Iâm going back to take a quick peek at a character that my betas have been saying is a little unlikable. I understand what they mean, now.
Oh!–Don’t forget that J Taylor Publishing is giving away five copies of the Make Believe anthology. Hop on over if you’d like a chance at a copy! http://www.jtaylorpublishing.com/blog/?p=1125
I’m going to review this sucker when I get a chance, but let’s take a minute to describe the Glass Man.
Contact information. No matter who you are sending your work to or how many times you have sent them work before, you alwaysâlet me repeat thatâALWAYS include your full contact information in the upper left hand of the page. (The editor could be your brother, and you should still follow this rule, if nothing else but because it is common courtesy and shows you respect the relationship between hopeful author and potential publisher.)
legal name, mailing address, email address, and optionally, phone number. I canât tell you how many times I have received manuscripts without this information. Usually from an author Iâve worked with before, but not always. See, we fall into a trap of informality thanks to the internet. With so many manuscripts being submitted electronically we donât always consider that the email might become disassociated with the manuscript file, thus leaving the publisher no way to contact the author. Bad enough when what is forthcoming is a rejection. An absolute tragedy when they want to send you an acceptance. Face itâŚthey have to know where to send the contractâŚor the check!
Jennifer M Eaton 